Saito_Hajime wrote:

I've seen forums that implement a 500x150 pixels limit for sig pics, so I think that is the ideal size for sig pics. But 500x200 is also good.

I think short as possible, so 500x150 doesn't sound too bad to me. (But 500x0 would be better )

a combined 500x200 should be more than enough.

�� wrote:

(But 500x0 would be better )

There are others who feel that way as well.

Notice that only the people who are active participants in the look, feel, and well being of this site are participating, whereas those self-involved, one-trick pony members are completely oblivious to this thread and other decision-making threads?

Just my editorial.

bmwracer wrote:

There are others who feel that way as well. Notice that only the people who are active participants in the look, feel, and well being of this site are participating, whereas those self-involved, one-trick pony members are completely oblivious to this thread and other decision-making threads? Just my editorial.

It seems man's natural state is apathy.

it may or may not affect them, why should they care... i can't make a difference, or i have no say...

is probably what the mentality is...

krim wrote:

it may or may not affect them, why should they care... i can't make a difference, or i have no say... is probably what the mentality is...

Exactly like voters here in the U.S.

bmwracer wrote:

Exactly like voters here in the U.S.

Here in th US, it's more like...

whatever gets passed, will just get overturned when the other party gets into power next time.

krim wrote:

Here in th US, it's more like... whatever gets passed, will just get overturned when the other party gets into power next time.

Yup.

Pretty riduiculous. New policy seems to get stuck a lot in Neutral.



Well, if there aren't any votes against or any more suggestions in about a week, I'm gonna implement the new signature guidlines and start PMing people who are out of bounds.

start PM'n them now.

qilver wrote:

right on...

But somehow you have to make a sacrifice for greater good
_________________

I say we randomly set the sizes limitations. That'll throw some people for a loop.

dochira wrote:

I say we randomly set the sizes limitations. That'll throw some people for a loop.

Sounds good: For fangirls: 500x1, for everyone else, 500x150.


Actually, I'm going to go with 500x150 as the maximum.

Any objections?

bmwracer wrote:

Sounds good: For fangirls: 500x1, for everyone else, 500x150. Actually, I'm going to go with 500x150 as the maximum. Any objections?

Nai, sounds good

Poor discriminated fangirls
_________________

Wanna trade? My Drama List (UPDATED: July, 2013)

bmwracer wrote:

Sounds good: For fangirls: 500x1, for everyone else, 500x150. Actually, I'm going to go with 500x150 as the maximum. Any objections?

sounds good to me.
otsukaresama deshita
_________________

"Ano toki ano basho kienai kono kizuna"
so pretty...

bmwracer wrote:

Sounds good: For fangirls: 500x1, for everyone else, 500x150. Actually, I'm going to go with 500x150 as the maximum. Any objections?

I'm ok with it.
_________________

Okay.

Let the madness begin.

To all concerned:

It appears that a number of people are abusing the signature feature in the J-Dorama forum by using images that are dimensionally too large. These large images clutter up the forum pages and makes them near-unreadable for members.

As of today (August 23, 2006), all signature images are restricted to a maximum dimensional size of 500(w)x150(h) pixels.

Please make the necessary changes to your signature images as soon as possible or they will be removed.

Thanks.

Bump.

About time wasn't there this new rule implemented last year, or was that only about filesize wise..

either way 500x150 is big enough to be a banner.

Terryb wrote:

About time wasn't there this new rule implemented last year, or was that only about filesize wise.. either way 500x150 is big enough to be a banner.

It was just file size, so people easily worked around that, unfortunately.

Thanks for your support.